Rapid Polar Sea Ice Decline Overview
What is sea ice?
- Sea ice is the frozen ocean: it forms when the sea freezes and floats on the ocean surface.
- The areal extent of sea ice varies dramatically between summer and winter.
- Minimum in late summer, maximum in late winter.
- Sea ice is highly reflective and so reflects large amounts of sunlight during the polar day.
- Sea ice is very mobile and so responds to winds and ocean currents, not just temperatures.
- The thickness of sea ice is varies throughout the year, by up to several metres.
- Since 1978 satellites have provided estimates of sea ice extent.
- These data have shown a long-term retreat in the Arctic and a significant reduction in Antarctic sea ice over the last decade.
Sea Ice retreat matters to weather and climate outisde the polar regions
RRS Sir David Attenborough moored at Gromit's Creek, Antarctica
2024/25.
This shows the contrast between thick ice shelves that are previously land ice that
has flowed out to sea and broken sea ice.
(credit: Pete Bucktrout, BAS)
Arctic Sea Ice as an Indicator
Sea ice is an important component of the climate system because it regulates the amount of energy entering the climate system from the sun and alters the transfer of heat and momentum between the atmosphere and the ocean. Sea-ice loss is linked to faster warming in the poles than the global average, a phenomenon known as Arctic or polar amplification. The weather at mid-latitudes, where the UK is positioned, is fundamentally linked to the difference in temperature between the cold Arctic to the north and the warm sub-tropics to the south. Therefore, changes in this temperature gradient are a key control over present and future trends in weather and climate over the UK.
Prediction Capability and Research
Approaches to sea ice prediction
Accurate prediction of sea ice conditions can provide valuable insight and decision support at
various time and space scales.
Two broad approaches can be used for prediction of sea ice, as is done for weather forecasting.
Dynamical models solve physical equations, often derived from first principles, on a
three-dimensional grid, to iterate forwards atmosphere, ocean and sea ice conditions.
Data-driven models derive relationships between variables (for example, past sea ice and current
sea ice) and use this to make predictions. While relatively simple statistical models such as
linear regression have long been used in forecasting, data-driven models now include advanced AI
models. In 2021, Andersson et al. published the first AI-based sea ice forecasting model,
IceNet, which outperformed the state-of-the-art dynamical predictions at lead-times of two to
six months. Since then, data-driven models have proliferated with various authors exploring
different domains, architectures and input variables.
Current capability of monthly-to-seasonal forecasting
IceNet: a machine learning forecasting system
IceNet (https://icenet.ai/) is a UK-led sea ice AI forecasting system which has previously been demonstrated to have skill exceeding that of dynamical systems for summer Arctic sea ice. The original version predicts sea ice conditions based on recent sea ice cover and atmospheric conditions.
Benchmarking IceNet for both hemispheres
Recently, IceNet’s performance in the southern hemisphere has been assessed for the first time,
alongside a re-assessment of its performance in the northern hemisphere.
Models have been trained and evaluated on test periods selected to characterise both ‘extreme’
and ‘normal’ sea ice conditions. These periods were 2007 (extreme low in Arctic), 2018 (‘normal’
in both hemispheres) and 2023 (extreme low in Antarctic). In these test cases, the IceNet
consistently outperforms a linear trend forecast at short (1-2 month) lead times, with mixed
performance at longer lead times. IceNet shows improvement against a linear trend forecast,
although still large errors, for long leadtimes for the 2023 extreme Antarctic case. This is
demonstrated in the Figure below; for the forecasts produced at 3 month leadtime (bottom), the
IceNet forecast largely follows the linear trend prediction, whereas at 1 month leadtime IceNet
is providing substantial added information to the linear trend forecast.
Figure: Example sea Ice ‘hindcast’ predictions from IceNet without ocean variables for Arctic and Antarctic, September 2023. Models are initialised 1 month (top) and 3 months (bottom) ahead. Left hand panels: sea ice edge (15% sea ice concentration contour) in model (red), observations (blue) and linear trend baseline (black). Right hand panels: sea ice concentration error.
Research extensions: ocean variables
Prior research suggests that there may be a source of predictability at either or both poles
due to heat stored below the ocean surface (Bushuk et al, 2021); the thickness of the ice; and
the salinity (salt content) of the surface waters.
Therefore, ongoing research is exploring the performance of IceNet incorporating ocean
reanalysis (ORAS5) variables into the IceNet training and prediction pipeline, alongside
atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) variables and sea ice concentration. Specifically, surface
salinity, mixed layer depth, the heat content of the upper 300m and sea ice thickness have
been added. Preliminary results suggest that, with the current IceNet architecture and
configuration, these variables do not improve prediction skill for the test periods discussed
above, or overall performance in training.
Future IceNet extensions: towards operational forecasting
The current IceNet infrastructure uses as input sea ice concentrations from a product which uses discontinued source data from US satellites. This data was discontinued in 2025 meaning it can no longer support future operational forecasting capabilities. Current work is therefore developing the infrastructure to use an ongoing product based on a different data source. This data is higher-resolution (6.25km rather than 25km spatial resolution) and ongoing. The previous product began in 1979 whereas this begins in 2001. The shorter data record provides less data for the AI models to learn from, and it is unclear what impact this will have, if any, on model performance. Existing and new approaches are being explored to optimise skill and move towards operational forecasting capability that can be used to inform UK polar resilience.